Return to sport after articular cartilage repair.

Return to Sports Participation after Articular Cartilage Repair in the Knee. Scientific evidence.
Mithoefer K, Hambly K, Della Villa S, Silvers H, Mandelbaum B. American Journal of Sports Medicine; 2009, 37, 167 – 176.

Knee articular cartilage injury is a common complaint among those participating in sport, both recreationally and as professionals. Rarely occurs in isolation, most often is associated with other injuries e.g.  ACL tear, meniscal lesion. Sports medicine physician are aware that repaired cartilage requires enough quality to withstand significant stresses related with high impact sports. Current cartilage repair techniques (microfracture, osteochondral autograft transfer, osteochondral allograft transplantation and autologous chondrocyte transplantation) are successful in reducing pain and improving knee function. Nevertheless, ability to return to sports activity is the most important outcome measure for the injured athlete. Mithoefer et al. systematically reviewed available literature on return to sports activity following knee cartilage repair and tried to determine influencing factors.
Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Average follow – up period was 42 months. Results indicated that return to sports participation was possible in 73% overall, with highest return rates following osteochondral autograft transplantation. Time to return to sports activity varied between surgical techniques, ranging from 7 (microfracture) to 18 months (autologous chondrocyte transplantation) on average. Sport activity level prior to injury was possible only in 65% of athletes with best durability seen after autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Return to sport was influenced by several factors. Younger age resulted in better rates of return to sports participation for all surgical techniques. Another significant factor was time between diagnosis and surgery. Athletes undergoing surgical treatment within 12 months after injury returned to sport in 66 % (microfracture) and  67% (ACT) of cases whereas those receiving treatment after a year of being symptomatic, returned to sport in 14% and 15% of cases respectively. Better clinical effects were reported in acute lesions, compared to chronic lesions, especially to those with degenerative joint changes. Lesions smaller than 2 cm² were associated with higher return rates for microfracture and osteochondral autograft transfer. The type of cartilage injury had also influence, with better outcomes seen after chondral defect rather than osteochondral defects. One study reported lesions location as significant factor affecting return to sports ability. Return to sports was significantly better in competitive athletes than recreational athletes after microfracture and chondrocyte transplantation, but no difference was observed with osteochondral autograft transfer.
Authors concluded that current articular cartilage repair techniques improve activity levels even under high mechanical stresses and therefore are successful treatment options for injured athletes wishing to return to sports participation. Highest return rates were observed after osteochondral autograft transfer which could be explained with that this is a minimally invasive technique, is used to treat smaller defects, has a short postoperative rehabilitation, and does not require generation of cartilage repair tissue. Some studies reported decrease in activity level scores over the years, and according to authors, this could be attributed to limited cartilage fill volume and poor cartilage morphology (microfracture procedure),  limited defect fill from settling of the transferred cylinder, incomplete peripheral repair cartilage integration, relative thinning of the repair cartilage owing to donor-recipient mismatch, and subchondral sclerosis (osteochondral transfer) as well as to socioeconomic and psychological factors, such as the fear of reinjury or family obligations. Finally, authors summarize that younger competitive players with small defect size, short duration of symptoms, and fewer prior surgical interventions have a higher probability to return to sports.
All rights reserved to the American Journal of Sports Medicine.

No comments:

Post a Comment